Studies of microclimatic heterogeneity of atmospheric precipitation on a separate field
https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2023-4-72-78
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to determine the microclimatic heterogeneity of precipitation in a single field during the active vegetation of agricultural plants on the territory of the Field experimental station of the Russian State Agricultural Academy named after C.A. Timiryazev. An assessment of the qualitative influence of local conditions forming the microclimate on the distribution of precipitation within a single field is given. Studies have established uneven moistening of agricultural landscapes by atmospheric precipitation during active vegetation in conditions of limited land use. The greatest influence of the studied microclimate factors was exerted by urban development, the presence of forest belts and the features of the underlying surface. At the same time, an important role in the processes of accumulation of productive moisture belongs to the water-physical properties of the soil, in particular its ability to absorb and retain moisture. To solve the problems of precision farming and create a digital model of a single field, taking into account the microclimatic features of the distribution of light, heat and moisture resources in agrophytocenoses is extremely important in terms of ensuring a safe production process and increasing crop yields. Background standard values of stationary meteorological site data do not fully reflect the dynamics of variability of meteorological elements in individual agricultural fields under the influence of local conditions. Therefore, the study and competent application of knowledge about the microclimatic features of agricultural landscapes in general and of a particular field in particular, is of great practical importance in the production of agricultural products. Scientifically-based placement of crops, site selection, clarification of terms and methods of sowing, terms and methods of tillage are only part of the important role of microclimate accounting. In addition, field crops determine their phytoclimatic differences, the peculiarity of which is the variability of microclimatic parameters during the growing season. This should also be taken into account when assessing the processes of plant growth and development, as well as planning various agrotechnical measures.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. A. DronovaRussian Federation
Dronova Elena Aleksandrovna, candidate of geographical sciences, associate professor of the department of meteorology and climatology
127434, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya str., 49
AuthorID: 919602
A. I. Belolyubtsev
Russian Federation
Belolyubtsev Alexander Ivanovich, doctor of agricultural sciences, head of the department of meteorology and climatology
127434, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya str., 49
AuthorID: 272616
V. V. Shabanov
Russian Federation
Shabanov Vitaly Vladimirovich, doctor of technical sciences, professor of the department of land reclamation and reclamation
127434, Moscow, Timiryazevskaya str., 49
AuthorID: 195937
O. A. Strizhnikov
Russian Federation
Strizhnikov Oleg Aleksandrovich, post graduate student of the department of land reclamation and reclamation
127434, Moscow, Bolshaya Akademicheskaya str., 44, bldg. 2
AuthorID: 1071520
References
1. Belolyubtsev A. I., Dronova E.A., Asaulyak I.F. Scenarios for the impact of climate change on agriculture. // Natural and technical sciences. 2018. No. 6 (120). P. 77-82.
2. Goryshina N.G. Features of the microclimate of soils and their mapping on the example of the Pskov region // Soil climate – L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1971. P. 73-79.
3. Konstantinova T.S. Agroclimatic resources of territories with complex relief (theoretical foundations of assessment and methods of their accounting in practical problems). Autoref. Doc. Diss. Moscow, 1992.45 p.
4. Konstantinov A.R., Struzer L.R. Forest strips and harvest. Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1974. 213 p.
5. Mishchenko Z.A. Multiscale models of thermal resources for territories with complex terrain. – Proceedings of the GGO. 1976. – Vol. 351. P. 31-45.
6. Mishchenko Z.A., Lyashenko G.V. Microclimatology: Navchalnyiposibnik. Odessa: 2005.336 p.
7. Muminov F.A. Heat balance and meteorological regime of the potato field. – Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1963. 150 p.
8. Pigoltsina G.B., Goryshina N.G., Nikolaeva Z.I. Microclimatic study of experimental agricultural fields of programmed harvest. Proceedings of the GGO, 1980. – Vyp. 426. – P. 70-83.
9. Ross Yu.K. Radiation regime and architectonics of vegetation cover. – Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1975. 341 p.
10. Shabanov V.V., Golovanov A.I. Some aspects of precision land reclamation. 2019. № 1. P. 92-96
11. Shabanov V.V., Markin V.N., Soloshenkov A.D. Assessment of the requirements of soil biota to hydrothermal conditions of the external environment In the collection: Reports of the TSHA. 2020. P. 173-178.
12. Shabanov V.V., Soloshenkov A.D. Quantitative methods for assessing fertility for the purposes of accurate reclamation regulation. 2020. № 4. P. 13-22.
13. Shabanov V.V., Markin V.N., Soloshenkov A.D. Questions of substantiation of the need for accurate reclamation regulation of a complex of factors of lifeplant life and soil biota. In the collection: Problems of development of agricultural land reclamation and water management complex based on digital technologies. Proceedings of the International Jubilee Scientific and Practical Conference. 2019. P. 71-76.
14. Markin V.N., Shabanov V.V. Database for assessing the ecological state of natural systems. // Environmental management. 2019. № 5. P. 111-117.
Review
For citations:
Dronova E.A., Belolyubtsev A.I., Shabanov V.V., Strizhnikov O.A. Studies of microclimatic heterogeneity of atmospheric precipitation on a separate field. Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2023;(4):72-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2023-4-72-78