Preview

Prirodoobustrojstvo

Advanced search

Features of the use of combined technologies in conducting monitoring of the Simferopol reservoir

https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2024-1-42-48

Abstract

The article discusses the peculiarities of the use of combined technologies in monitoring on the example of the Simferopol reservoir, namely low-frequency electromagnetic field (VLF) technology and numerical modeling of dangerous structural violations. It is possible to detect decompression of the soil base of the structure. When the field finds an object in the ground that conducts electricity, it detects the hydraulic structure’s own magnetic field, namely decompaction and subsidence. On the basis of the studies carried out, numerical simulation of the dam of the Simferopol reservoir was carried out with various dangerous structural defects and defects acquired over a long period of operation. It should be noted that during the period of operation at the complex of hydraulic structures of the Simferopol reservoir, no major repairs and reconstruction were carried out. The design features of the tooth in the body of the dam were numerically calculated. Stress and strain diagrams were obtained. Based on the calculations, in order to reduce water losses for filtration in the left side of the dam, the installation of a cementation curtain is envisaged. It has been established that the height of the cementation curtain is different depending on the depth of occurrence of water-resistant rocks. Based on the materials of the reconnaissance survey and calculations, field work and laboratory tests, it is possible to conclude that the structure is stable, while maintaining the current intensity of operation.

About the Authors

M. A. Bandurin
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
Russian Federation

Mikhail A. Bandurin, doctor of technical sciences, associate professor

ScopusAuthorID57201780087;  RSCI Author ID518464; WOSResearchID: D-5293-2016

13 Kalinina str., Krasnodar, 350044 



V. A. Volosukhin
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
Russian Federation

Victor A. Volosukhin, doctor of technical sciences, professor

ScopusAuthorID57201781001;  RSCI Author ID290467 

13 Kalinina str., Krasnodar, 350044 



A. A. Rudenko
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
Russian Federation

Artem A. Rudenko, post graduate student

ScopusAuthorID57486226000; RSCI Author ID1049046

13 Kalinina str., Krasnodar, 350044 



A. S. Romanova
Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin
Russian Federation

Anna S. Romanova, MA student

RSCI Author ID1159646 

13 Kalinina str., Krasnodar, 350044 



References

1. Babinetskaya A.S., Derbasova N.M. Justification of the choice of the conceptual model of the catchment for forecasting the water supply of the Simferopol reservoir // Energetic plants and technologies. 2020. Vol. 6, No. 4. P. 137-142.

2. Ivankova T.V.  Rational use of water resources of the long-term exploitation of the Simferopol reservoir on the Salgir River, Republic // Construction and architecture. 2017. Vol. 5, No. 4, P. 212-218. – DOI: 10.29039/article_5a3d2049b1e4a6.72412492.

3. Dunaeva E.A.,  Popovich V.F.,  Lyashevsky V.I.  Analysis of the dynamics of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of water resources using open GIS and agrohydrological models. // Scientific Journal of the Russian Research Institute of Land Reclamation Problems. 2015. № 1(17). P. 127-141.

4. Volosukhin Ya.V.,  Navolokin D.Yu.  Ensuring the safety of water use in the Republic of Crimea. // Vowater supply and sanitary engineering. 2017. № 6. P. 4-9.

5. Kosichenko Yu.M.,  Savenkova E.A.  Calculation assessment of the reliability of the work of the ground dam of a small reservoir using diagnostic indicators accordingto observational data. // Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2012. № 5. P. 41-45.

6. Volosukhin V.A.  Safety of engineering protection structures in the Psekups River Valley taking into account over time changes in loads and impacts / M.A. Bandurin, I.A. Prikhodko, A.Yu. Verbitsky // Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2022. № 5. P. 52-59. – DOI: 10.26897/1997-6011-2022-5-52-59.

7. Kozlov D.V.,  Klovsky A.V.  Expert assessment of the causes of the occurrence of the accident on the ground dam of the Sardobinsky reservoir. // Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2021. № 5. P. 75-84. – DOI 10.26897/1997-6011-2021-5-75-84.

8. Snezhko V.L.,  Sidorova S.A.,  Simonovich O.S.  Forecast of the safety level of ground low-pressure dams // Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2019. № 2. P. 72-79. – DOI 10.34677/1997-6011/2019-2-72-80

9. Karpenko N.P., Yurchenko I.F. Theoretical justification of the structure of the classifier of safety criteria of the GTS of the melioration of the water management complex // Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2015. № 1. С. 12-15. 2015.

10. Karpenko N.P.,  Yurchenko I.F.  Classification of measures of safe operation of melioration systems // Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2016. № 1. P. 58-62.

11. Pogorelov A.V.,  Lipilin D.A.,  Kurnosova A.S.  Satellite monitoring of the Krasnodar reservoir // Geographic bulletin. 2017. № 1(40). P. 130-137. – DOI 10.17072/2079-7877-2017-1-130-137.

12. Bandurin M.A.,  Prikhodko I.A.,  Romanova A.S. Monitoring of the low-pressure earth dam of the engineering protection of the Psekups river of the lower Kuban // International agricultural journal. 2023. No 1(391). P. 74-79. – DOI 10.55186/25876740_2023_66_1_74.


Review

For citations:


Bandurin M.A., Volosukhin V.A., Rudenko A.A., Romanova A.S. Features of the use of combined technologies in conducting monitoring of the Simferopol reservoir. Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2024;(1):42-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2024-1-42-48

Views: 108


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1997-6011 (Print)