Hydraulic flow modeling of a proposed sand and gravel mining site in the Tom river
https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2025-2-97-104
Abstract
This study is focused on changes in flow velocities and channel stability parameters associated with the projected quarry mining operation. The paper deals with the hydraulic flow characteristics of the Tom River site located between the Tomsk and Koziulino hydrological posts. Geometric parameters and hydrological characteristics, including flow modules and resistance modules, were estimated for cross sections representing both the existing and the design condition. The water level drawdown and navigational safety assessment is based on these calculations, taking into account the adopted design water levels and discharges. A flow model based on planned current lines and curvilinear cross sections obtained from the channel survey were carried out. The planned current line represents the vertical direction of the mean velocity vector and the curvilinear cross sections are orthogonal to these current lines. The combination of these elements forms a plan flow model that defines plan jets (flow between current lines) and plan flow bands (flow between crossplots). The Shezi and Manning formulas are used to express the free surface slope along an arbitrary plan flow streamline. Non-erosive and erosive velocities were calculated for modelled cross sections along current lines in pre- and post-quarry scenarios. The analysis revealed a significant decrease in flow velocities and a slight increase in both non-degradation and scour velocities after quarrying. The maximum calculated water level drop was 0.0186 m, which is significantly lower than the acceptable threshold of 0.05 m, indicating minimal impact. Quantitatively, non-degradation velocities increased from 0.55-0.65 m/s to 0.63-0.75 m/s, and degradation velocities increased from 0.7-0.85 m/s to 0.82-0.98 m/s following quarry development. This modelling approach provides a basis for understanding and predicting hydraulic behavior in the river reach under study.
About the Authors
T. V. PilipenkoRussian Federation
Tatiana V. Pilipenko, CSc (Eng), Associate Professor of the Department of GTSBE
Novosibirsk, 630008, Leningradskaya St., 113
AuthorID: 408544
N. P. Karpenko
Russian Federation
Nina P. Karpenko, DSC (Eng), Leading Researcher
127434, Moscow, B. Akademicheskaya str., 44, building 2
D. E. Kupriyanov
Russian Federation
Daniil E. Kupriyanov, Chief Engineer
Novosibirsk, 630008, Leningradskaya St., 113
30087, Novosibirsk region, Novosibirsk, Nemirovicha-Danchenko str. 167
M. A. Shiryaeva
Russian Federation
Margarita A. Shiryaeva, Junior Researcher at the Department of Water Hygiene
2 Semashko str., Mytishchi, 141014
References
1. Vladimirova O.N. Interconnections between river and groundwater in the lower reaches of the Tom River (Tomsk Region, Russian Federation) / O.N. Vladimirova, O.G. Savichev // Geoecology, engineering geology, hydrogeology, geocryology, 2021. 4, P. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869780921040111
2. Gladkova A.S. Geoecological characteristics of the floodplain and terrace of the Tom River for construction purposes / A.S. Gladkova, N.N. Minaev // Bulletin of the Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building, 2022. V. 24, No. 3, P. 158-172. https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2022-24-3-158-172
3. Chalov R.S. (2023). Floodplain-channel branchings: formation conditions and hydrological-morphological characteristics. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5. Geography, 2, 10-21. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0579-9414.5.78.2.2
4. Standard STO 52.08.31-2012 “Extraction of nonmetallic construction materials in water bodies. Accounting for the channel process and recommendations for the design and operation of channel quarries.” Access mode: https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293755/4293755870.pdf
5. SP-33-101-2003. Determining the main calculated hydrological characteristics. Official publication. Moscow: Gosstroy of Russia, 2004. 74 p. Access mode: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200035578.
6. Naumova A.A. (2024). Classification and review of design schemes of flowmeters with constricting devices for open channels / A.A. Naumova, T.V. Pilipenko, K.R. Ponomarchuk // Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2024. No. 5, P. 88-95. https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2024-5-88-95
7. Naumenko N.O. Assessment of the actual volume of water in a water body using an overwater unmanned aerial vehicle / N.O. Naumenko, M.A. Shiryaeva, N.V. Khanov. Land reclamation and hydraulic engineering. 2024. V. 14, No. 2. P. 275-286. https://doi.org/10.2712-9357
8. Chalov R.S. (2022). Channel process management, technogenic impacts on river channels, and problems of hydroecological safety. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series “Biology. Earth Sciences”. 2022. V. 32. No. 2. P. 184-191. https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9518-2022-32-2-184-191
9. Berkovich K.M. Vertical deformations of riverbeds in Russia under the influence of channel quarries / K.M. Berkovich, L.V. Zlotina, L.A. Turykin. Geomorphology and paleogeography. 2024. V. 55. No. 1. P. 5-12. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2949178924010016
10. Tan C., Plink-Björklund P. (2021). Morphodynamics of supercritical flow in a linked river and delta system, Daihai Lake, Northern China. Sedimentology. https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12839
Review
For citations:
Pilipenko T.V., Karpenko N.P., Kupriyanov D.E., Shiryaeva M.A. Hydraulic flow modeling of a proposed sand and gravel mining site in the Tom river. Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2025;(2):97-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2025-2-97-104