Modeling of sediment fl ow capacity for designing coastal protection structures on the Tuapse-Adler section of the North Caucasus Railway
https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2025-4-103-110
Abstract
In this article, the object of research is the lithodynamic processes in the coastal zone ofthe sea. The problem of assessing sediment transport under the influence of storm waves is considered in order to select a method of engineering protection. The section between the Kuapse and Svirskaya rivers ofthe Lazarevsky district of Sochi, along which the railway line runs, is considered. Mathematical modeling of sediment flow capacity in the coastal zone was performed for this site. The research was carried out using mathematical modeling. Mathematical modeling was performed based on digital terrain models using the methods used by the authors as the basis for regulatory methods for calculating the lithodynamic characteristics ofthe marine coastal zone in SP 277.125800.2016. The results of calculations ofthe transport capacity of the water flow (capacity) of the alongshore sediment flow in the average annual section of the study area are presented. The results of modeling the transport of sediment in storms with a 2% probability are also presented. During the modeling process, the situation was studied when the full-profile wave-absorbing strip was filled with material with an average grain size of 70 mm.
About the Authors
G. V. TlyavlinaRussian Federation
Galina V. Tlyavlina, СSs(Tech), head of the laboratory of modeling, calculations and standardization in hydraulic engineering
354002, Sochi, Yana Fabritciusa str., 1
127994, GSP-4, Moscow, Obraztsova St, 9, B. 9
AuthorID: 604630
Scopus: 57215131371
K. N. Makarov
Russian Federation
Konstantin N. Makarov, DSs (Tech), professor, head of the Department of Construction and Service, Sochi State University
354003, Sochi, Plastunskaya st, 94
AuthorID: 133366
Scopus: 70006042633
R. M. Tlyavlin
Russian Federation
Roman M. Tlyavlin,CSs (Tech), deputy general director of the Joint Stock Company «Central research in statute of Transport Construction», head of R&D Centre «Seashores»
354002, Sochi, Yana Fabritciusa str., 1
AuthorID: 123325
References
1. Powell E.J. A Review of Coastal Management Approaches to Support the Integration of Ecological and Human Community Planning for Climate Change / E.J. Powell, M.C. Tyrrell, A. Milliken, J.M. Tirpak, M.D. Staudinger // Journal of Coastal Conservation. 2019. Vol. 23. Iss. 1. P. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-018-0632-y
2. Rangel-Buitrago N. Risk Assessment as Tool for Coastal Erosion Management / N. Rangel-Buitrago W.J. Neal, V.N. De Jonge // Ocean and Coastal Management. 2020. Vol. 186. P. 105088-105099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105099
3. Stokes K. Forecasting Coastal Overtopping at Engineered and Naturally Defended Coastlines / К. Stokes, T. Poate, G. Masselink, E. King, A. Saulter, N. Ely// Coastal Engineering. 2021. Vol. 164. P. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103827
4. Makarov K.N. Scientific and methodological substantiation ofthe general scheme of coastal protection ofthe Sochi agglomeration “Marine facade” / K.N. Makarov, G.V. Tlyavlina, R.M. Tlyavlin. Sochi: Sochi State University, 2019. 207 p.
5. Smirnov G.N. Oceanology/ G.N. Smirnov. 2nd ed., revised. and add. Moscow: Higher School, 1987. 406 p.
6. Ashpiz E., Savin A., Tlyavlin R., Tlyavlina G. Urgent Issues of Anti-Deformation Measures to Protect Coastal Railways // Proceedings of the 14th MEDCOAST Congress on Coastal and Marine Sciences, Engineering, Management and Conservation (Marmaris, 22-26 October 2019). Marmaris, 2019. Vol. 2. P. 841-852.
7. Tlyavlina G.V., Tlyavlin R.M., Ashpiz E.S. Influence of lithodynamics of coastal area on the safety of railway operation on the Tuapse-Adler section of the North Caucasus Railway. Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2024;14(3):580-591. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2024-3-580-591
8. Tlyavlina G.V., Makarov K.N., Tlyavlin R.M. Mathematical modeling of engineering protection measures for bridge crossings from hydrodynamic effects ofthe maritime environment. The Siberian Transport University Bulletin. 2024;(71):27-34. DOI: 10.52170/1815-9265_2024_71_27.
9. Saengsupavanich Ch. Flaws in Coastal Erosion Vulnerability Assessment: Physical and Geomorphological Parameters // Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2021. Vol. 15. Iss. 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09368-2
10. Dean R.G. Beach nourishment: theory and practice. World Scientific Inc. / R.G. Dean. 2002. 399 p.
11. Divinsky B.V. Bottom Sediment Suspension under Irregular Surface Wave Conditions / B.V. Divinsky, R.D. Kosyan // Oceanology. 2019. Vol. 59, No. 4. P. 482-490. DOI: 10.1134/S0001437019040039.
12. Dohmen-Janssen C. Sheet flow and suspended sediment due to wave groups in a large wave flume/ C. Dohmen-Janssen D. Hanes // Continental Shelf Research. 2005. 25. P. 333-347. DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2004.10.009.
13. Leont’yev I.O. Evaluation of depth of closure on a sandy coast / I.O. Leont’yev // Oceanology. 2022. Т. 62. № 2. С. 258-264.
14. Kos’yan R. NowdaysProblems of SedimentTransport Modelling in the coastal zone / R. Kos’yan, J. Grune, B. Divinskiy, I. Podymov // Proceedings of 34th Conference on Coastal Engineering, Seoul, South Korea. 2015. No. 34. Sediment.
15. Petrov V.A., Yaroslavtsev N.A. Evaluation of longshore transport of sediments in lithodynamic systems (by the example of the coast section between Tuapse and Adler). Geoekologiya journal. 2020. № 4. P. 60-67.
16. Tlyavlina G.V., Tlyavlin R.M., Megrelishvili I.Yu. Comparison of the indices of various coast-protection structures // Transport Construction. 2011. № 5. P. 10-12.
Review
For citations:
Tlyavlina G.V., Makarov K.N., Tlyavlin R.M. Modeling of sediment fl ow capacity for designing coastal protection structures on the Tuapse-Adler section of the North Caucasus Railway. Prirodoobustrojstvo. 2025;(4):103-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/1997-6011-2025-4-103-110